In this series titled ‘Myths & Misconceptions’, we will address common thoughts, expectations, and ideas that people have about their speaker roles which aren’t actually true. In this article, we’ll be looking at the first speaker.
‘Define the Motion’
There exists a widespread idea that all first speakers are required to ‘define the motion’ as per the dictionary meaning. This should not be the main intention because it is better to explain your team’s interpretation of the motion. In your preparation, you should strive to deconstruct the motion, and explore the ideal strategic approach.
Let’s look at a mock motion:
THR the influence of traditional masculinity on society.
With motions of this sort, the debate is really won or lost in how you approach the motion itself. How would you define ‘traditional masculinity’? Team Proposition may associate ‘traditional masculinity’ with ‘toxic masculinity’. Team Opposition, on the other hand, would argue that those two ideas are independent from each other. Another possible definition to explore: what is society?
As you can see, there is great potential in expanding your debate just by taking more time to analyse and unpick the motion.
‘Don’t rebut’
Again, a common belief is that first speakers should leave all their rebuttal to the second or third speakers. This is simply incorrect and could be detrimental to your team’s performance. If Team Proposition’s first speaker makes a critical error, the Opposition first speaker should use their speech as an opportunity to strike back and regain momentum. As the adage goes ‘A lie told too many times becomes the truth’; and in this way, you should not let your opponent repeat false statements without calling them out.
‘Don’t mention the best point’
Many first speakers are intimidated to discuss the strong arguments as they think they are stealing the job of the second speaker. We believe the first speaker should mention the most important point in their team’s case. Thus, they are able to set the tone for the debate and provide a platform for their second speaker to use.
Disclaimer: This purpose of this article is solely to analyse debating technique and not offer any views or stance on the content of the aforementioned debate/motion.
Produced by Nikola Pandurovic (Chief Editor at DebatePro)
DebatePro 